Reform Leaders Weigh in on Hobby Lobby, Conestoga Cases at Supreme Court

March 25, 2014
On the occasion of today's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc and Conestoga Wood Specialties, Corp. v. Sebelius, Rabbi Rick Jacobs, President of the Union for Reform Judaism, Rabbi Steve Fox, CEO of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Rabbi Marla J. Feldman, Executive Director of Women of Reform Judaism and Rabbi David Saperstein, Director and Counsel of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism jointly released the following statement:
As rabbis deeply committed to religious liberty as well as to reproductive rights, we are proud that our organizations have joined an amicus brief in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties, Corp. v. Sebelius, defending both the Affordable Care Act's contraception mandate and the right of all people to live according to the teachings of their faith. Alongside over 25 of our faith partners, we argued in that brief for a vigorous interpretation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) - a law we played a key role in crafting the 1990s - that protects individuals' right to religious freedom. The United States has long modeled religious freedom, and maintaining the current framework of religious free exercise protections ensures a standard of liberty unparalleled in the world. It is due to this understanding of the separation of church and state and religious freedom that Jews and other members of religious minorities have been able to thrive in this country. However, in that same brief we also cautioned against an overbroad application of RFRA, which would ascribe the same religious free exercise rights to for-profit corporations that are accorded to individuals. A corporation is simply not the same as an individual with religious beliefs, a spiritual connection to a higher power, and religious practices that require protection. Our Reform Movement has long championed the advancement of women's equality within our own synagogues and in the broader society. We believe that all women must have the right to make their own health care choices according to their faith and conscience - including when it comes to reproductive health. Even if the Court decides corporations do have some free exercise rights (and resolves the complicated issue of who holds those rights, such as the owners, the board, the stockholders or the managers), we do not believe that the way the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act mandate functions poses a substantial burden on those Free Exercise rights. And even should the Court hold that there is a substantial burden, we believe that the compelling interest of ensuring all women have access to reproductive health care justifies the limitation on such Free Exercise claims. We believe the contraception mandate of the ACA wisely and delicately balances religious liberty and conscience claims whether they are made by the employer or the employees. Inspired by our faith and our tradition of social justice we stand together in defense of universal, comprehensive health care, of women's rights, and of religious liberty, all of which the contraception mandate upholds. We look forward to the Court's decision and will continue to work to ensure that our nation remains both a beacon of religious liberty and protector of women's rights.
Read more from the press release here. Last week on WRJblog, we offered some background and resources about the case. Read more here. SCOTUSblog.com is offers comprehensive reporting and insight on all things Supreme Court. Read their analysis of today's oral argument here. Be sure to check back here for updates and further analysis as we approach the decision date, likely in late spring.   Image courtesy of the Atlantic.  

Related Posts

Paycheck Fairness Vote a Positive Step Toward Full Equality

September 11, 2014
On Wednesday, the Senate voted to proceed on the Paycheck Fairness Act (S. 2199). The Paycheck Fairness Act is an important step towards closing the staggering persistent pay gap between male and female workers, and thus is of major significance to Women of Reform Judaism and the Reform Jewish community at large. Accordingly, WRJ Executive Director Marla Feldman and Religious Action Center Deputy Director Rachel Laser have jointly released the following press release:

An Arizona Congregation Forms a New Kind of "Israel Bonds"

September 2, 2014
by Bonnie Golden This article originally appeared at the Arizona Jewish Post. It highlights the experience of one woman with the WRJ-Israel Twinning Program. Jews of a certain age might share similar early impressions of Israel. In Chicago, where I grew up, the young congregants at Lawn Manor Hebrew Congregation were inculcated with a firm commitment to the Jewish state. We saved our dime tokens to plant our trees, circle-danced Israeli-style, and practiced rudimentary Hebrew conversation. During and after the 1967 war, the Chicago area Jewish community held multiple events to raise money for Israel. All were urged to support the young state by holding Israel Bond drives. What follows are only a few of the new “Israel bonds” formed on Temple Emanu-El of Tucson, AZ's pilgrimage to Israel this past June.